PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXUS vs. RLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXUS vs. RLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly lower than RLY's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has outperformed RLY with an annualized return of 10.22%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.43% annualized return.


VXUS

1D
0.40%
1M
0.71%
YTD
13.69%
6M
15.52%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
10.22%

RLY

1D
0.47%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
15.03%
6M
15.93%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
8.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXUS vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
13.69%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
15.03%20.26%2.53%2.56%7.86%22.85%-0.59%15.63%-11.72%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VXUS and RLY is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between VXUS and RLY has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VXUS vs. RLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXUS
RLY

Financial Services

22.3%
0.0%

Technology

18.1%

-

Industrials

16.1%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
2.6%

Basic Materials

7.6%
25.1%

Healthcare

7.1%
0.8%

Energy

5.2%
30.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
3.6%

Communication Services

4.4%

-

Utilities

3.2%
15.9%

Real Estate

2.6%
5.4%

Financial Services

VXUS
22.3%
RLY
0.0%

Technology

VXUS
18.1%
RLY

-

Industrials

VXUS
16.1%
RLY
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VXUS
8.4%
RLY
2.6%

Basic Materials

VXUS
7.6%
RLY
25.1%

Healthcare

VXUS
7.1%
RLY
0.8%

Energy

VXUS
5.2%
RLY
30.1%

Consumer Defensive

VXUS
5.0%
RLY
3.6%

Communication Services

VXUS
4.4%
RLY

-

Utilities

VXUS
3.2%
RLY
15.9%

Real Estate

VXUS
2.6%
RLY
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXUS vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXUS vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VXUSRLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

5.95

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

22.94

-13.21

VXUS vs. RLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the RLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXUS and RLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VXUS vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, roughly equal to the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and RLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXUSRLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.97%

-37.75%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-4.63%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-10.08%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-18.94%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-34.17%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-3.37%

+1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-9.44%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.20%

+1.73%

Volatility

VXUS vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.25%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXUSRLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

3.25%

+3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

8.47%

+5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

10.37%

+5.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

13.57%

+2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

13.82%

+3.38%

VXUS vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VXUS vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison

VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than RLY's 2.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.92%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.67%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


VXUS and RLY have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to RLY (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs RLY's -37.75%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.22% vs 8.43% for RLY. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.22% return vs 8.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RLY.

RLY has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.67% for VXUS.

VXUS is categorized as Global Equities, while RLY is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.50% for RLY.

RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXUS and RLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer