PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VXUS vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VXUS vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 13.24% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VXUS has underperformed FNDX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while FNDX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.32% annualized return.


VXUS

1D
3.33%
1M
1.32%
YTD
13.24%
6M
14.27%
1Y
28.59%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.05%

FNDX

1D
1.47%
1M
1.97%
YTD
14.46%
6M
13.13%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
14.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VXUS vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
13.24%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.46%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%28.65%-7.30%17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VXUS and FNDX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.78

The correlation between VXUS and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

VXUS vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VXUS
FNDX

Financial Services

22.3%
14.1%

Technology

18.1%
19.1%

Industrials

16.1%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.2%

Basic Materials

7.6%
3.7%

Healthcare

7.1%
12.0%

Energy

5.2%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
7.4%

Communication Services

4.4%
10.1%

Utilities

3.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.8%

Financial Services

VXUS
22.3%
FNDX
14.1%

Technology

VXUS
18.1%
FNDX
19.1%

Industrials

VXUS
16.1%
FNDX
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VXUS
8.4%
FNDX
9.2%

Basic Materials

VXUS
7.6%
FNDX
3.7%

Healthcare

VXUS
7.1%
FNDX
12.0%

Energy

VXUS
5.2%
FNDX
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

VXUS
5.0%
FNDX
7.4%

Communication Services

VXUS
4.4%
FNDX
10.1%

Utilities

VXUS
3.2%
FNDX
3.2%

Real Estate

VXUS
2.6%
FNDX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VXUS vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VXUS vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VXUSFNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.54

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

5.09

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

19.73

-9.96

VXUS vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VXUS and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VXUS vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VXUSFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.97%

-37.72%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-6.06%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.58%

-16.30%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-19.06%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-37.72%

+1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-0.77%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-3.55%

-4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.56%

+1.37%

Volatility

VXUS vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 3.07%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VXUSFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

3.07%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.05%

7.63%

+6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.09%

10.42%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

15.22%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

17.51%

-0.31%

VXUS vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VXUS vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.68%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


VXUS and FNDX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to FNDX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 10-year performance, FNDX leads with 14.32% vs 10.05% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 14.32% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDX.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.

VXUS is categorized as Global Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VXUS and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer