VXUS vs. DBMF
VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. VXUS is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VXUS returned 8.73%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VXUS charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
VXUS vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VXUS achieves a 12.56% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 11.26% return.
VXUS
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 24.98%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.55%
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 1Y
- 26.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.22%
VXUS vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 12.56% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 10.26% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 11.26% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXUS and DBMF is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.18 |
Over the past year, VXUS and DBMF have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXUS vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
VXUS
DBMF
VXUS vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VXUS | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 4.41 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.26 | 14.93 | -6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VXUS vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXUS drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXUS and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXUS | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.97% | -20.39% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.27% | -6.10% | -5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -15.60% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -20.39% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.00% | -1.03% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.17% | -6.50% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.80% | +1.23% |
Volatility
VXUS vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.69%. This indicates that VXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXUS | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 2.69% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.89% | 10.05% | +4.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 12.63% | +4.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 12.45% | +3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 12.37% | +4.64% |
VXUS vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXUS has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
VXUS vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than DBMF's 5.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.11% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.59% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXUS and DBMF have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to DBMF (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VXUS dropped -35.97% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
On 5-year performance, VXUS leads with 8.73% vs 8.59% for DBMF. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 8.73% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 2.59% for VXUS.
VXUS is categorized as Global Equities, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VXUS and 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VXUS and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer