VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO
VXM-B.TO (CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged)) and CEQP.TO (CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VXM-B.TO is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Value Index, while CEQP.TO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by CI. VXM-B.TO is passively managed, while CEQP.TO is actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VXM-B.TO charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CEQP.TO.
Performance
VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VXM-B.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 10.02%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 33.73%
- 3Y*
- 28.33%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.90%
CEQP.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VXM-B.TO CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) | 5.32% |
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF | 7.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VXM-B.TO and CEQP.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VXM-B.TO
CEQP.TO
VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) (VXM-B.TO) and CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF (CEQP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VXM-B.TO | CEQP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VXM-B.TO | CEQP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.37 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VXM-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than CEQP.TO's maximum drawdown of -8.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VXM-B.TO and CEQP.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VXM-B.TO | CEQP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -8.33% | -27.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | 0.00% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -1.89% | -4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | — | — |
Volatility
VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VXM-B.TO | CEQP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 16.40% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.40% | +1.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 16.40% | +2.51% |
VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VXM-B.TO has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CEQP.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VXM-B.TO vs. CEQP.TO - Dividend Comparison
VXM-B.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than CEQP.TO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEQP.TO CI Equity+ Asset Allocation ETF | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXM-B.TO CI Morningstar International Value Index ETF (Unhedged) | 2.33% | 2.21% | 3.97% | 3.66% | 3.67% | 2.05% | 2.18% | 1.59% | 6.77% | 1.52% | 1.92% | 2.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VXM-B.TO and CEQP.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CEQP.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CEQP.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for VXM-B.TO.
VXM-B.TO is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while CEQP.TO is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for VXM-B.TO and 0.30% for CEQP.TO.
Find the right allocation for VXM-B.TO and CEQP.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer