VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L
VWRP.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and VMIG.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while VMIG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRP.L returned 12.46%/yr vs 3.38%/yr for VMIG.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWRP.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VMIG.L.
Performance
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWRP.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than VMIG.L's 5.18% return.
VWRP.L
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.40%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
VMIG.L
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 4.25%
- YTD
- 5.18%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- —
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 11.92% | 13.94% | 19.60% | 15.64% | -8.41% | 20.00% | 12.27% | 1.72% |
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 5.18% | 12.85% | 7.41% | 8.08% | -17.25% | 16.12% | -4.72% | 12.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWRP.L and VMIG.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between VWRP.L and VMIG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Financial Services
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Industrials
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Communication Services
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Healthcare
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Consumer Defensive
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Energy
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Basic Materials
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Utilities
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Real Estate
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VWRP.L
VMIG.L
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWRP.L | VMIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.21 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.20 | 1.22 | +2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.06 | 4.41 | +12.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWRP.L | VMIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 1.16 | +1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.23 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.31 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWRP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, smaller than the maximum VMIG.L drawdown of -41.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRP.L and VMIG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWRP.L | VMIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -41.38% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.10% | -11.59% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -16.44% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -29.51% | +11.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.46% | -0.69% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.39% | -10.02% | +6.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 3.22% | -1.47% |
Volatility
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) is 2.95%, while Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that VWRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VMIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWRP.L | VMIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 3.70% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.68% | 10.08% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 12.26% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 14.98% | -2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 17.31% | -2.35% |
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWRP.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VMIG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VWRP.L vs. VMIG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VWRP.L nor VMIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VWRP.L and VMIG.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VMIG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VMIG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRP.L.
VWRP.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VMIG.L is Europe Equities. VWRP.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VMIG.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRP.L and 0.10% for VMIG.L.
Find the right allocation for VWRP.L and VMIG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer