VMIG.L vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
VMIG.L and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VMIG.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. It was launched on May 14, 2019. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both VMIG.L and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VMIG.L or VOO.
Key characteristics
| VMIG.L | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.43% | 27.15% |
| 1Y Return | 16.99% | 39.90% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.39% | 10.28% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.63% | 16.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.41 | 3.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.13 | 4.19 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.26 | 1.59 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.85 | 4.60 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.52 | 21.00 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.42% | 1.85% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.92% | 12.34% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.38% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.38% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between VMIG.L and VOO is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VMIG.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VMIG.L achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 27.15% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VMIG.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VMIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VMIG.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VMIG.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
VMIG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.23% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
VMIG.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VMIG.L drawdown since its inception was -41.38%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VMIG.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VMIG.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.88% and 3.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.