VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VWRP.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and BCHS.L (Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRP.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while BCHS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWRP.L returned 12.04%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for BCHS.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWRP.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BCHS.L.

Performance

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VWRP.L is traded in GBP, while BCHS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCHS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRP.L achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than BCHS.L's 25.35% return.

VWRP.L

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 10.60%
• 6M: 11.30%
• 1Y: 28.03%
• 3Y*: 17.31%
• 5Y*: 12.04%
• 10Y*: —

BCHS.L

• 1D: 5.50%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 25.35%
• 6M: 18.40%
• 1Y: 56.79%
• 3Y*: 41.92%
• 5Y*: 12.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VWRP.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating	10.60%	13.94%	19.60%	15.64%	-8.41%	20.00%	12.27%	1.72%
BCHS.L Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc	25.35%	35.24%	18.50%	58.28%	-46.25%	26.00%	89.05%	0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRP.L and BCHS.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2019	0.64

The correlation between VWRP.L and BCHS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VWRP.L	BCHS.L
Technology	29.0%	30.8%
Financial Services	16.1%	57.6%
Industrials	11.0%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	6.0%
Communication Services	8.8%	3.8%
Healthcare	8.0%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	0.0%
Energy	4.2%	0.0%
Basic Materials	3.8%	0.0%
Utilities	2.7%	1.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.0%

Return for Risk

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRP.L

VWRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VWRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
VWRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
VWRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
VWRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

BCHS.L

BCHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BCHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BCHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 38
BCHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BCHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) and Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VWRP.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	1.37	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	1.92	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.23	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.82	1.80	+2.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.17	3.63	+11.54

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the BCHS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRP.L and BCHS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, smaller than the maximum BCHS.L drawdown of -55.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRP.L and BCHS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWRP.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.10%	-55.89%	+30.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.10%	-29.49%	+22.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-35.64%	+18.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.64%	-55.89%	+38.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-4.94%	+3.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.38%	-23.07%	+19.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	14.64%	-12.85%

Volatility

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VWRP.L) is 3.57%, while Invesco CoinShares Global Blockchain UCITS ETF Acc (BCHS.L) has a volatility of 12.78%. This indicates that VWRP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWRP.L	BCHS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	12.78%	-9.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.07%	26.27%	-18.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	38.60%	-27.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.92%	38.27%	-25.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.96%	36.52%	-21.56%

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRP.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than BCHS.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

VWRP.L vs. BCHS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VWRP.L nor BCHS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWRP.L and BCHS.L in my portfolio?

VWRP.L and BCHS.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VWRP.L or BCHS.L?

On fees, VWRP.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWRP.L or BCHS.L?

VWRP.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BCHS.L.

What is the main difference between VWRP.L and BCHS.L?

VWRP.L is categorized as Global Equities, while BCHS.L is Technology Equities. VWRP.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while BCHS.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRP.L and 0.65% for BCHS.L.