PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRD.L is traded in USD, while VEMA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEMA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than VEMA.L's 1.42% return.


VWRD.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.28%
YTD
11.63%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.64%

VEMA.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.08%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.18%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
11.63%22.38%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%14.90%
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
1.42%12.01%6.31%8.90%-15.42%-1.26%5.63%9.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and VEMA.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2019

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMA.L
VEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWRD.LVEMA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.29

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.40

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

9.50

+4.11

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and VEMA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWRD.LVEMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.73

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.29

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.36

+0.45

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, which is greater than VEMA.L's maximum drawdown of -24.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and VEMA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.LVEMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-24.04%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-4.02%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-6.33%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-24.04%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.34%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-6.02%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.02%

+1.08%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) at 1.95%. This indicates that VWRD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.LVEMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

1.95%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

4.27%

+5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

5.61%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

8.09%

+7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

9.30%

+6.42%

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than VEMA.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. VEMA.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while VEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEMA.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.24%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and VEMA.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for VEMA.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VEMA.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VEMA.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.25% for VEMA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and VEMA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer