VEMA.L vs. EBND

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND).

VEMA.L and EBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VEMA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Feb 19, 2019. EBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011. Both VEMA.L and EBND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

VEMA.L vs. EBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VEMA.L vs. EBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VEMA.L Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.09%	4.15%	8.11%	3.45%	-5.29%	-0.35%	2.49%	8.03%
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF	-0.70%	7.57%	-1.00%	3.57%	-1.35%	-8.81%	1.42%	5.05%

Different Trading Currencies

VEMA.L is traded in GBP, while EBND is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EBND values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMA.L achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than EBND's -0.70% return.

VEMA.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: 5.48%
• 3Y*: 5.34%
• 5Y*: 3.06%
• 10Y*: —

EBND

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: -0.70%
• 6M: 1.09%
• 1Y: 6.32%
• 3Y*: 2.38%
• 5Y*: 1.25%
• 10Y*: 2.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMA.L vs. EBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EBND's 0.30% expense ratio.

EBND

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF

VEMA.L

Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating

Return for Risk

VEMA.L vs. EBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMA.L

VEMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
VEMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
VEMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
VEMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
VEMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

EBND

EBND Risk / Return Rank: 67
EBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
EBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EBND Omega Ratio Rank: 70
EBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
EBND Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMA.L vs. EBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VEMA.L	EBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.05	-0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	1.52	-0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.20	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	1.30	-0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.29	5.17	-2.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VEMA.L vs. EBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the EBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMA.L and EBND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VEMA.L	EBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75	1.05	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.17	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.22	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between VEMA.L and EBND is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VEMA.L vs. EBND - Dividend Comparison

VEMA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VEMA.L Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF	5.32%	5.54%	5.89%	5.26%	4.75%	3.83%	3.67%	4.68%	4.70%	2.00%

Drawdowns

VEMA.L vs. EBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum EBND drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMA.L and EBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEMA.L	EBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.59%	-29.51%	+14.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.93%	-6.63%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.41%	-27.57%	+16.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.99%	-5.49%	+3.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.39%	-10.96%	+4.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.13%	1.49%	+0.64%

Volatility

VEMA.L vs. EBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VEMA.L) is 1.90%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that VEMA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VEMA.L	EBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.90%	2.92%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.43%	4.36%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.29%	6.07%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.20%	7.56%	+0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.58%	9.67%	-0.09%