PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) and ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - VWRD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while ISLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L returned 12.64%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for ISLN.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VWRD.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISLN.L.

Performance

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than ISLN.L's 2.87% return. Over the past 10 years, VWRD.L has underperformed ISLN.L with an annualized return of 12.64%, while ISLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.84% annualized return.

VWRD.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.28%
YTD
11.63%
6M
13.01%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.64%

ISLN.L

1D
0.43%
1M
0.11%
YTD
2.87%
6M
29.09%
1Y
113.78%
3Y*
45.97%
5Y*
21.30%
10Y*
15.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF		11.63%22.38%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%24.36%
ISLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC		2.87%147.59%21.12%-0.77%3.39%-12.85%45.85%16.35%-8.76%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and ISLN.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2012

0.24

The correlation between VWRD.L and ISLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VWRD.L
ISLN.L

Technology

30.2%
2.8%

Financial Services

16.1%
2.5%

Industrials

10.2%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
2.3%

Communication Services

8.9%
0.4%

Healthcare

8.1%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
0.4%

Energy

4.3%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.6%
6.6%

Utilities

2.9%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.6%
3.5%

Technology

VWRD.L
30.2%
ISLN.L
2.8%

Financial Services

VWRD.L
16.1%
ISLN.L
2.5%

Industrials

VWRD.L
10.2%
ISLN.L
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VWRD.L
9.1%
ISLN.L
2.3%

Communication Services

VWRD.L
8.9%
ISLN.L
0.4%

Healthcare

VWRD.L
8.1%
ISLN.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

VWRD.L
4.9%
ISLN.L
0.4%

Energy

VWRD.L
4.3%
ISLN.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

VWRD.L
3.6%
ISLN.L
6.6%

Utilities

VWRD.L
2.9%
ISLN.L
2.0%

Real Estate

VWRD.L
1.6%
ISLN.L
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF

iShares Physical Silver ETC

Often compared with VWRD.L:
VWRD.L vs. VWRP.LVWRD.L vs. IWDA.LVWRD.L vs. VOOVWRD.L vs. JEPQVWRD.L vs. JEPG.LVWRD.L vs. EGLN.LVWRD.L vs. SPY
Often compared with ISLN.L:
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.LISLN.L vs. SLVISLN.L vs. EGLN.LISLN.L vs. IGLN.LISLN.L vs. XAGUSD=XISLN.L vs. SLVR.LISLN.L vs. SVR-C.TO

Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
ISLN.L
ISLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ISLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

VWRD.LISLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.30
1.99

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.40
2.33

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.78

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.61

6.08

+7.52

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the ISLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and ISLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

VWRD.LISLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.99

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.60

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.51

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.12

+0.70

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum ISLN.L drawdown of -76.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and ISLN.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VWRD.LISLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-76.63%

+42.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-40.67%

+31.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-40.67%

+24.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-40.67%

+14.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-42.90%

+9.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-35.25%

+34.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-54.28%

+49.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

18.63%

-16.53%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) is 3.88%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a volatility of 17.61%. This indicates that VWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VWRD.LISLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

17.61%

-13.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.80%

54.22%

-44.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

56.90%

-44.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

35.49%

-20.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

30.92%

-15.20%

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than ISLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VWRD.L vs. ISLN.L - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while ISLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF		1.24%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

VWRD.L and ISLN.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ISLN.L is Silver. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while ISLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.20% for ISLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and ISLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer