PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VWRD.L is traded in USD, while 4GLD.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 4GLD.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWRD.L achieves a 10.27% return, which is significantly higher than 4GLD.DE's -4.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VWRD.L having a 12.94% annualized return and 4GLD.DE not far behind at 12.64%.


VWRD.L

1D
2.38%
1M
0.88%
YTD
10.27%
6M
11.90%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
12.94%

4GLD.DE

1D
2.82%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
-2.05%
1Y
24.35%
3Y*
29.42%
5Y*
17.54%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
10.27%22.39%17.65%22.31%-18.19%18.52%16.13%25.67%-9.70%24.35%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
-4.13%68.58%26.88%12.78%0.68%-3.06%23.04%18.91%-1.62%12.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VWRD.L and 4GLD.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.07

Over the past year, VWRD.L and 4GLD.DE have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWRD.L4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.19

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.08

+1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

3.28

+8.61

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWRD.L and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWRD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.83%, smaller than the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -44.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWRD.L and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWRD.L4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.83%

-44.26%

+10.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-22.52%

+13.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-22.52%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.02%

-22.52%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.83%

-22.52%

-11.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.99%

-20.33%

+18.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-17.59%

+13.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

7.40%

-5.24%

Volatility

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) is 4.40%, while Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that VWRD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWRD.L4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

7.56%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

21.74%

-11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

24.91%

-12.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

17.59%

-2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

15.77%

-0.04%

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWRD.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWRD.L vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while 4GLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.25%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWRD.L and 4GLD.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VWRD.L.

VWRD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VWRD.L and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWRD.L and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer