PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWOB vs. BEMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWOB vs. BEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) and Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWOB achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than BEMB's 1.75% return.


VWOB

1D
0.00%
1M
1.46%
YTD
2.24%
6M
2.00%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
9.00%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
3.52%

BEMB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.99%
YTD
1.75%
6M
1.72%
1Y
8.67%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWOB vs. BEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
2.24%13.49%5.20%8.79%
BEMB
Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
1.75%12.27%5.51%8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between VWOB and BEMB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023

0.96

The correlation between VWOB and BEMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWOB vs. BEMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWOB
VWOB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VWOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWOB Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VWOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWOB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BEMB
BEMB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWOB vs. BEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) and Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOBBEMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.37

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.37

10.17

-0.80

VWOB vs. BEMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWOB Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BEMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWOB and BEMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWOB vs. BEMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWOB drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, which is greater than BEMB's maximum drawdown of -6.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWOB and BEMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOBBEMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.98%

-6.17%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-3.67%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.71%

-6.17%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.27%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-0.93%

-3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.85%

+0.21%

Volatility

VWOB vs. BEMB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF (VWOB) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) at 1.31%. This indicates that VWOB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOBBEMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

1.31%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

3.57%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.27%

4.33%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.19%

5.86%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.34%

5.86%

+3.48%

VWOB vs. BEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWOB has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BEMB's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWOB vs. BEMB - Dividend Comparison

VWOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, less than BEMB's 6.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEMB
Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
6.85%6.88%6.31%5.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWOB
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond ETF
5.81%5.92%6.08%5.50%5.30%4.04%4.18%4.58%4.52%4.61%4.71%4.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VWOB and BEMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VWOB has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to BEMB (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWOB dropped -26.98% vs BEMB's -6.17%.

On 3-year performance, VWOB leads with 9.00% vs 8.46% for BEMB. On fees, VWOB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VWOB has performed better with a 9.00% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWOB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for BEMB.

BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.85%, compared with 5.81% for VWOB.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VWOB and 0.18% for BEMB.

BEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWOB and BEMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer