PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 7.69%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.46% annualized return.


VWO

1D
0.53%
1M
0.03%
6M
4.14%
YTD
9.99%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
7.69%
ALL TIME*
6.83%

VTV

1D
0.48%
1M
0.83%
6M
10.86%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
12.46%
ALL TIME*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$655.54M$670.79M$624.45M
$402.91M$469.57M$503.00M

VWO vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
9.99%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
16.93%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and VTV is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between VWO and VTV has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VWO vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
VTV

Technology

34.2%
15.3%

Financial Services

19.4%
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
3.9%

Industrials

7.9%
14.3%

Basic Materials

7.2%
3.0%

Communication Services

6.6%
2.9%

Energy

3.8%
6.9%

Healthcare

3.7%
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
8.7%

Utilities

2.8%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.5%

Technology

VWO
34.2%
VTV
15.3%

Financial Services

VWO
19.4%
VTV
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
9.1%
VTV
3.9%

Industrials

VWO
7.9%
VTV
14.3%

Basic Materials

VWO
7.2%
VTV
3.0%

Communication Services

VWO
6.6%
VTV
2.9%

Energy

VWO
3.8%
VTV
6.9%

Healthcare

VWO
3.7%
VTV
15.2%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.3%
VTV
8.7%

Utilities

VWO
2.8%
VTV
4.8%

Real Estate

VWO
2.0%
VTV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VWO vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWOVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.51

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

4.52

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.52

17.46

-10.94

VWO vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWO vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-59.27%

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-6.35%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-14.52%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.88%

-17.04%

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-36.78%

+0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-0.89%

-2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-7.82%

-7.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

1.64%

+1.79%

Volatility

VWO vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.54%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

2.54%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

7.73%

+7.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

10.29%

+7.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

13.82%

+3.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

16.62%

+2.55%

VWO vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than VTV's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.85%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.34%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and VTV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to VTV (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.46% vs 7.69% for VWO. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer