PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 6.77% return.


VWO

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.65%
YTD
8.50%
6M
9.73%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
8.60%

NTSX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
6.77%
6M
6.86%
1Y
22.68%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
8.50%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-9.86%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
6.77%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and NTSX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.62

The correlation between VWO and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
NTSX

Technology

29.6%
35.1%

Financial Services

19.5%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
10.1%

Industrials

8.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

8.0%
1.4%

Communication Services

7.1%
12.5%

Energy

4.6%
3.5%

Healthcare

3.9%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
5.5%

Utilities

2.9%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.5%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
NTSX
35.1%

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
NTSX
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
NTSX
10.1%

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
NTSX
7.7%

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
NTSX
1.4%

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
NTSX
12.5%

Energy

VWO
4.6%
NTSX
3.5%

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
NTSX
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
NTSX
5.5%

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
NTSX
2.1%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWONTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.49

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

10.91

-3.12

VWO vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWONTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.80

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.54

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.70

-0.43

Drawdowns

VWO vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWONTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-31.34%

-36.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-9.16%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-16.82%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.60%

-31.34%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.67%

-2.73%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.81%

-6.79%

-9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.08%

+1.04%

Volatility

VWO vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 4.33%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWONTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

4.33%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.80%

10.04%

+3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

12.65%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

17.09%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.23%

18.29%

+0.94%

VWO vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VWO vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than NTSX's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.09%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and NTSX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to NTSX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.26% vs 4.65% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for NTSX.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 1.09% for NTSX.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer