VWO vs. HYG
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 9.01%/yr vs 4.97%/yr for HYG. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HYG.
Performance
VWO vs. HYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 9.01%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 13.82%
- 6M
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
HYG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.97%
VWO vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 13.82% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.60% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and HYG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2007 | 0.57 |
The correlation between VWO and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
VWO vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VWO
HYG
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VWO
HYG
-
Financial Services
VWO
HYG
-
Consumer Cyclical
VWO
HYG
-
Industrials
VWO
HYG
-
Basic Materials
VWO
HYG
-
Communication Services
VWO
HYG
-
Energy
VWO
HYG
-
Healthcare
VWO
HYG
-
Consumer Defensive
VWO
HYG
-
Utilities
VWO
HYG
Real Estate
VWO
HYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
HYG
VWO vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWO | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | 1.85 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 2.80 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.36 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.99 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 13.22 | -2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWO | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.85 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.52 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.46 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
VWO vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and HYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -34.25% | -33.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -2.34% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -4.56% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.64% | -15.79% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -22.03% | -14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -3.24% | -12.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 0.53% | +2.56% |
Volatility
VWO vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.22%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | HYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 1.22% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.13% | 3.00% | +10.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 3.79% | +12.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 7.52% | +9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 8.29% | +10.91% |
VWO vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWO vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than HYG's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.37% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and HYG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to HYG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs HYG's -34.25%.
On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 9.01% vs 4.97% for HYG. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 9.01% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 2.37% for VWO.
VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.49% for HYG.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and HYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer