PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWO vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWO vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has outperformed HYG with an annualized return of 9.01%, while HYG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.97% annualized return.


VWO

1D
1.27%
1M
3.73%
YTD
13.82%
6M
15.26%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
9.01%

HYG

1D
0.08%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.60%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
3.87%
10Y*
4.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
13.82%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.60%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and HYG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2007

0.57

The correlation between VWO and HYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. HYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VWO
HYG

Technology

29.6%

-

Financial Services

19.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%

-

Industrials

8.0%

-

Basic Materials

8.0%

-

Communication Services

7.1%

-

Energy

4.6%

-

Healthcare

3.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.7%

-

Utilities

2.9%
99.6%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.4%

Technology

VWO
29.6%
HYG

-

Financial Services

VWO
19.5%
HYG

-

Consumer Cyclical

VWO
10.7%
HYG

-

Industrials

VWO
8.0%
HYG

-

Basic Materials

VWO
8.0%
HYG

-

Communication Services

VWO
7.1%
HYG

-

Energy

VWO
4.6%
HYG

-

Healthcare

VWO
3.9%
HYG

-

Consumer Defensive

VWO
3.7%
HYG

-

Utilities

VWO
2.9%
HYG
99.6%

Real Estate

VWO
2.2%
HYG
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWO vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VWOHYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.09

1.85

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.88

2.80

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.99

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.94

13.22

-2.28

VWO vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VWOHYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.85

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.52

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.60

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.46

-0.19

Drawdowns

VWO vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than HYG's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWOHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.68%

-34.25%

-33.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-2.34%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-4.56%

-12.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.64%

-15.79%

-16.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-22.03%

-14.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-3.24%

-12.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

0.53%

+2.56%

Volatility

VWO vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.22%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWOHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

1.22%

+4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.13%

3.00%

+10.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

3.79%

+12.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

7.52%

+9.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

8.29%

+10.91%

VWO vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWO vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than HYG's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.90%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.37%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VWO and HYG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to HYG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 10-year performance, VWO leads with 9.01% vs 4.97% for HYG. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VWO has performed better with a 9.01% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 2.37% for VWO.

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.49% for HYG.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWO and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer