VWO vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. VWO is passively managed, while GPIX is actively managed. Over the past year, VWO returned 29.26% vs 25.72% for GPIX. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

VWO vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than GPIX's 10.28% return.

VWO

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: 4.11%
• YTD: 13.17%
• 6M: 15.35%
• 1Y: 29.26%
• 3Y*: 16.84%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 9.11%

GPIX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 2.08%
• YTD: 10.28%
• 6M: 10.95%
• 1Y: 25.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWO vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	13.17%	25.60%	10.59%	10.83%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	10.28%	16.25%	21.77%	13.04%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and GPIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023	0.63

The correlation between VWO and GPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VWO vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VWO	GPIX
Technology	29.6%	39.2%
Financial Services	19.5%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	10.1%
Industrials	8.0%	7.7%
Basic Materials	8.0%	1.7%
Communication Services	7.1%	10.7%
Energy	4.6%	3.2%
Healthcare	3.9%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	4.4%
Utilities	2.9%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.2%	1.8%

Return for Risk

VWO vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWO

VWO Risk / Return Rank: 58
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 58

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 83
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWO vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VWO	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	2.42	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	3.30	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.46	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	3.35	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	16.40	-7.13

VWO vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VWO vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWO	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.68%	-17.50%	-50.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-7.71%	-3.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.14%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.80%	-1.48%	-14.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	1.57%	+1.59%

Volatility

VWO vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a higher volatility of 6.98% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 4.00%. This indicates that VWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWO	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.98%	4.00%	+2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.18%	8.63%	+5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.62%	10.69%	+5.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.51%	13.88%	+3.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.24%	13.88%	+5.36%

VWO vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VWO vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than GPIX's 7.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	7.97%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	2.38%	2.79%	3.20%	3.52%	4.11%	2.63%	1.91%	3.23%	2.88%	2.30%	2.52%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWO and GPIX in my portfolio?

VWO and GPIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VWO or GPIX?

VWO has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to GPIX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, VWO or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, VWO leads with 29.26% vs 25.72% for GPIX. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VWO or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, VWO has performed better with a 29.26% return vs 25.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWO or GPIX?

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VWO or GPIX?

GPIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.97%, compared with 2.38% for VWO.

What is the main difference between VWO and GPIX?

VWO is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.29% for GPIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.