VWO vs. EMXC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - VWO tracks the FTSE Emerging Index while EMXC tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VWO returned 5.92%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for EMXC. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VWO charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.

Performance

VWO vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 28.12% return.

VWO

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 4.14%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 1Y: 22.33%
• 3Y*: 15.67%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: 7.69%
• ALL TIME*: 6.83%

EMXC

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -4.55%
• 6M: 15.83%
• YTD: 28.12%
• 1Y: 51.73%
• 3Y*: 23.89%
• 5Y*: 10.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	$255.60M	$267.52M	$279.80M
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	$402.91M	$469.57M	$503.00M

VWO vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	9.99%	25.60%	10.59%	9.25%	-17.98%	1.26%	15.17%	20.75%	-14.76%	9.32%
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	28.12%	35.14%	2.68%	18.96%	-19.56%	8.54%	12.76%	15.80%	-12.96%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VWO and EMXC is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017	0.85

The correlation between VWO and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VWO vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VWO	EMXC
Technology	34.2%	53.4%
Financial Services	19.4%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	3.8%
Industrials	7.9%	6.5%
Basic Materials	7.2%	5.5%
Communication Services	6.6%	2.9%
Energy	3.8%	3.1%
Healthcare	3.7%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	2.4%
Utilities	2.8%	1.8%
Real Estate	2.0%	0.8%

Return for Risk

VWO vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VWO

VWO Risk / Return Rank: 52
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 51
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 54

EMXC

EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 78
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 81
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VWO vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VWO	EMXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.88	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.40	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.82	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.52	9.91	-3.39

VWO vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWO and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VWO vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and EMXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VWO	EMXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.68%	-42.81%	-24.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-18.43%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.37%	-19.12%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.88%	-28.91%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.56%	-13.07%	+9.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.73%	-10.15%	-5.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	5.23%	-1.80%

Volatility

VWO vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 5.60%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 10.77%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VWO	EMXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.60%	10.77%	-5.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	25.82%	-10.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.60%	27.64%	-10.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.56%	19.04%	-1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.17%	20.50%	-1.33%

VWO vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

VWO vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than EMXC's 2.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	2.08%	2.82%	2.69%	1.83%	2.85%	1.78%	1.45%	3.25%	2.63%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF	2.34%	2.79%	3.20%	3.52%	4.11%	2.63%	1.91%	3.23%	2.88%	2.30%	2.52%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VWO and EMXC in my portfolio?

VWO and EMXC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VWO or EMXC?

EMXC has higher volatility (10.77%) compared to VWO (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

Which ETF is better, VWO or EMXC?

On 5-year performance, EMXC leads with 10.90% vs 5.92% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VWO or EMXC?

Over the 5-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 10.90% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VWO or EMXC?

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VWO or EMXC?

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 2.08% for EMXC.

What is the main difference between VWO and EMXC?

VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VWO and 0.49% for EMXC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.