VWO vs. ABBV
VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index, while ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VWO returned 7.65%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for ABBV. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VWO vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWO achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's 13.52% return. Over the past 10 years, VWO has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 7.65%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.
VWO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 1Y
- 17.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.75%
ABBV
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 17.87%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 38.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.04%
- 5Y*
- 21.08%
- 10Y*
- 19.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.49%
VWO vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 7.88% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 13.52% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWO and ABBV is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.26 |
The correlation between VWO and ABBV shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWO vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank
VWO
ABBV
VWO vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VWO | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.27 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.21 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 4.89 | +0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VWO vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWO drawdown since its inception was -67.68%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWO and ABBV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWO | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.68% | -45.09% | -22.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -17.32% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.37% | -20.74% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.88% | -21.92% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -45.09% | +8.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -2.25% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -10.66% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 7.80% | -4.49% |
Volatility
VWO vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) is 5.81%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that VWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWO | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 10.69% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.93% | 19.21% | -4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 26.01% | -8.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 23.39% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.14% | 25.90% | -6.76% |
Dividends
VWO vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison
VWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than ABBV's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.70% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.39% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWO and ABBV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABBV has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to VWO (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWO dropped -67.68% vs ABBV's -45.09%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VWO and ABBV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer