PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VWNFX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VWNFX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VWNFX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than FBLEX's 10.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VWNFX having a 13.02% annualized return and FBLEX not far behind at 12.40%.


VWNFX

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
5.38%
6M
4.87%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
13.02%

FBLEX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.97%
YTD
10.21%
6M
9.61%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VWNFX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VWNFX
Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares
5.38%18.51%13.91%21.01%-13.26%28.84%14.41%29.02%-8.62%15.61%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.21%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VWNFX and FBLEX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012

0.95

The correlation between VWNFX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VWNFX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VWNFX
VWNFX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VWNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VWNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VWNFX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VWNFXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

3.63

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

14.62

-3.46

VWNFX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VWNFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VWNFX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VWNFX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VWNFX drawdown since its inception was -57.57%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWNFX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VWNFXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.57%

-39.73%

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-6.89%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.76%

-14.71%

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.72%

-19.00%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.44%

-39.73%

+2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-0.77%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-3.81%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.70%

+0.24%

Volatility

VWNFX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares (VWNFX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) at 3.35%. This indicates that VWNFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VWNFXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.35%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

8.21%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

10.83%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

14.79%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

17.41%

+1.21%

VWNFX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VWNFX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

VWNFX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

VWNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.87%, more than FBLEX's 10.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.08%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
VWNFX
Vanguard Windsor II Fund Investor Shares
10.87%11.46%10.50%5.11%7.26%7.83%7.31%10.06%11.38%7.34%8.08%7.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VWNFX and FBLEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VWNFX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FBLEX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VWNFX dropped -57.57% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

FBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VWNFX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer