VWID vs. ASGM
VWID (Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF) and ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VWID is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Value Index (net), while ASGM is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Virtus. VWID is passively managed, while ASGM is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VWID charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for ASGM.
Performance
VWID vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VWID achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than ASGM's 22.52% return.
VWID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- 12.61%
- 1Y
- 27.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.20%
- 10Y*
- —
ASGM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 24.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VWID vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VWID Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | 7.96% | 14.74% |
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 22.52% | 11.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between VWID and ASGM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VWID vs. ASGM — Risk / Return Rank
VWID
ASGM
VWID vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VWID | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VWID | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 2.95 | -2.31 |
Drawdowns
VWID vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VWID drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VWID and ASGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VWID | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -6.62% | -28.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -0.53% | -1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.69% | -1.22% | -3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | — | — |
Volatility
VWID vs. ASGM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VWID | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.05% | 15.67% | -3.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.15% | 15.67% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 15.67% | +0.73% |
VWID vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VWID has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
VWID vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison
VWID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than ASGM's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 3.69% | 4.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWID Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | 4.54% | 4.86% | 4.48% | 4.97% | 5.73% | 10.70% | 4.71% | 1.99% | 4.55% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VWID and ASGM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VWID is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VWID is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.
VWID has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.69% for ASGM.
VWID is categorized as Dividend, while ASGM is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VWID and 0.86% for ASGM.
Find the right allocation for VWID and ASGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer