PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VVSM.DE is traded in EUR, while EMIM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMIM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVSM.DE achieves a 88.80% return, which is significantly higher than EMIM.L's 24.15% return.


VVSM.DE

1D
5.78%
1M
14.92%
YTD
88.80%
6M
94.46%
1Y
164.58%
3Y*
55.11%
5Y*
38.39%
10Y*

EMIM.L

1D
2.76%
1M
4.16%
YTD
24.15%
6M
27.50%
1Y
44.91%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VVSM.DE
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
88.80%33.22%31.47%70.20%-32.79%58.38%-15.76%
EMIM.L
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
24.15%16.91%14.45%7.15%-14.80%7.30%5.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VVSM.DE and EMIM.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020

0.58

The correlation between VVSM.DE and EMIM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVSM.DE
VVSM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VVSM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVSM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

EMIM.L
EMIM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVSM.DEEMIM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.44

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.76

4.00

+9.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.81

13.91

+30.90

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVSM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.82, which is higher than the EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVSM.DE and EMIM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVSM.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.65%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVSM.DE and EMIM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVSM.DEEMIM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.65%

-34.80%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-10.65%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.52%

-17.95%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.65%

-22.35%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-3.48%

+2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.48%

-9.29%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.58%

3.07%

+0.51%

Volatility

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE) has a higher volatility of 13.48% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) at 7.32%. This indicates that VVSM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVSM.DEEMIM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.48%

7.32%

+6.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.15%

15.25%

+10.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.27%

18.05%

+15.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.43%

16.47%

+14.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.86%

18.19%

+13.67%

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVSM.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVSM.DE vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VVSM.DE nor EMIM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VVSM.DE and EMIM.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMIM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMIM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VVSM.DE.

VVSM.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while EMIM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. VVSM.DE tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped ESG Index, while EMIM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VVSM.DE and 0.18% for EMIM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVSM.DE and EMIM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer