PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVSGX vs. NBGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVSGX vs. NBGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVSGX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than NBGIX's 6.58% return.


VVSGX

1D
0.10%
1M
3.94%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.02%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
10Y*

NBGIX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.47%
YTD
6.58%
6M
4.25%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVSGX vs. NBGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VVSGX
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund
11.32%8.99%10.85%14.20%-32.21%-3.59%
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
6.58%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VVSGX and NBGIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2021

0.90

The correlation between VVSGX and NBGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVSGX vs. NBGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVSGX
VVSGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
VVSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VVSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVSGX vs. NBGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) and Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVSGXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

0.57

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.83

0.97

+0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.11

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.86

+1.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.35

2.30

+5.04

VVSGX vs. NBGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the NBGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVSGX and NBGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVSGXNBGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.57

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.54

-0.54

Drawdowns

VVSGX vs. NBGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVSGX drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum NBGIX drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVSGX and NBGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVSGXNBGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.74%

-51.62%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.47%

-10.75%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.74%

-27.48%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.09%

-9.08%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.82%

-7.47%

-17.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

3.98%

-0.68%

Volatility

VVSGX vs. NBGIX - Volatility Comparison

VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund (VVSGX) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) at 4.06%. This indicates that VVSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVSGXNBGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

4.06%

+2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

11.31%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.94%

16.04%

+3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.02%

19.66%

+5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.02%

20.23%

+4.79%

VVSGX vs. NBGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVSGX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than NBGIX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVSGX vs. NBGIX - Dividend Comparison

VVSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than NBGIX's 15.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
15.40%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%
VVSGX
VALIC Company I Small Cap Growth Fund
2.23%0.00%0.00%7.74%10.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVSGX and NBGIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VVSGX has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to NBGIX (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVSGX dropped -44.74% vs NBGIX's -51.62%.

VVSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVSGX and NBGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer