PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBGIX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBGIX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NBGIX having a 9.90% return and WFSPX slightly lower at 9.77%. Over the past 10 years, NBGIX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 9.56%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.68% annualized return.


NBGIX

1D
2.11%
1M
4.01%
YTD
9.90%
6M
7.43%
1Y
12.07%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
9.56%

WFSPX

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.77%
6M
8.77%
1Y
25.45%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
15.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBGIX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
9.90%-4.55%9.20%15.73%-19.35%18.25%25.07%29.68%-6.76%16.02%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
9.77%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between NBGIX and WFSPX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1999

0.84

The correlation between NBGIX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBGIX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBGIX
NBGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
NBGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
NBGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBGIX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBGIXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.39

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.01

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

13.58

-10.66

NBGIX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBGIX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBGIX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBGIX drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBGIX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBGIXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.62%

-58.21%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-8.90%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.48%

-18.74%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.27%

-24.51%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.53%

-33.74%

-0.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-1.72%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-12.76%

+5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.02%

1.97%

+2.05%

Volatility

NBGIX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class (NBGIX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBGIXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.67%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

9.83%

+1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.30%

12.49%

+3.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

16.97%

+2.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

18.07%

+2.17%

NBGIX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBGIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBGIX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

NBGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.93%, more than WFSPX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBGIX
Neuberger Berman Genesis Fund Institutional Class
14.93%16.41%2.14%3.13%11.11%10.91%3.87%6.00%12.49%14.10%6.53%11.28%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.59%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBGIX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBGIX has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to WFSPX (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBGIX dropped -51.62% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBGIX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer