PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVPSX vs. CSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVPSX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Fund (VVPSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVPSX achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than CSMDX's 12.84% return.


VVPSX

1D
-0.64%
1M
3.17%
6M
7.70%
YTD
11.31%
1Y
17.30%
3Y*
5.38%
5Y*
-3.06%
10Y*
4.67%
ALL TIME*
6.95%

CSMDX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-1.03%
6M
6.76%
YTD
12.84%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
6.50%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VVPSX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VVPSX
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Fund
11.31%8.87%-1.40%19.75%-45.18%45.53%-3.33%35.94%-14.51%8.70%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
12.84%2.72%2.24%18.89%-14.89%22.60%8.29%29.90%-5.20%10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VVPSX and CSMDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017

0.82

The correlation between VVPSX and CSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVPSX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VVPSX
VVPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VVPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
VVPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMDX
CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VVPSX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Fund (VVPSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVPSXCSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

1.57

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.23

4.87

-2.64

VVPSX vs. CSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVPSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the CSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVPSX and CSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VVPSX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVPSX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVPSX and CSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVPSXCSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-37.28%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.65%

-9.20%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.84%

-24.60%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.43%

-24.60%

-30.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.04%

-1.60%

-27.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.39%

-5.69%

-10.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.60%

2.97%

+3.63%

Volatility

VVPSX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Fund (VVPSX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 3.30%. This indicates that VVPSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVPSXCSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

3.30%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.75%

10.17%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

14.40%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.42%

18.12%

+4.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.64%

19.07%

+4.57%

VVPSX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVPSX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVPSX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison

VVPSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than CSMDX's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
2.78%3.14%1.33%0.81%4.07%6.67%0.38%2.61%4.40%0.13%0.00%
VVPSX
Vulcan Value Partners Small Cap Fund
2.14%2.38%1.17%0.35%14.10%22.85%0.09%4.60%18.92%6.38%0.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVPSX and CSMDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VVPSX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to CSMDX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VVPSX dropped -55.43% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.

CSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVPSX and CSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer