PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVMX.DE vs. ICLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VVMX.DE is traded in EUR, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VVMX.DE having a 30.24% return and ICLN slightly lower at 29.29%.


VVMX.DE

1D
-1.82%
1M
-9.18%
YTD
30.24%
6M
37.51%
1Y
146.32%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
10Y*

ICLN

1D
0.95%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
29.29%
6M
28.89%
1Y
61.09%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VVMX.DE
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
30.24%68.45%-30.81%-21.17%-26.46%16.96%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
29.29%29.60%-20.81%-22.79%0.43%-0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VVMX.DE and ICLN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VVMX.DE
VVMX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VVMX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVMX.DEICLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.59

3.91

+3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.66

13.46

+6.20

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVMX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVMX.DE and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVMX.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.26%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVMX.DE and ICLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVMX.DEICLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.26%

-84.40%

+11.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.40%

-15.69%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.55%

-42.73%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.51%

-28.84%

+3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-57.98%

+16.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.89%

4.55%

+3.34%

Volatility

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) have volatilities of 12.59% and 12.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVMX.DEICLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.59%

12.22%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.22%

21.55%

+10.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.13%

27.08%

+19.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.36%

26.01%

+10.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.36%

26.55%

+9.81%

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVMX.DE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVMX.DE vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

VVMX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.28%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%
VVMX.DE
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVMX.DE and ICLN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for VVMX.DE.

VVMX.DE is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for VVMX.DE and 0.39% for ICLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVMX.DE and ICLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer