VVL.TO vs. EFR.TO
VVL.TO (Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD) is Global Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while EFR.TO (Energy Fuels Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, VVL.TO returned 13.78%/yr vs 24.13%/yr for EFR.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VVL.TO vs. EFR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVL.TO achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than EFR.TO's 26.16% return.
VVL.TO
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 33.99%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
EFR.TO
- 1D
- -7.08%
- 1M
- -14.75%
- YTD
- 26.16%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 228.27%
- 3Y*
- 42.87%
- 5Y*
- 24.13%
- 10Y*
- 23.37%
VVL.TO vs. EFR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 10.59% | 21.53% | 14.96% | 16.51% | 0.45% | 29.74% | -3.32% | 13.38% | -9.42% | 12.32% |
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 26.16% | 169.01% | -22.21% | 13.37% | -13.25% | 78.89% | 117.74% | -35.92% | 71.24% | 2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVL.TO and EFR.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2016 | 0.27 |
The correlation between VVL.TO and EFR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVL.TO vs. EFR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VVL.TO
EFR.TO
VVL.TO vs. EFR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) and Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VVL.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 4.50 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | 9.10 | +6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VVL.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.39 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.34 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.02 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
VVL.TO vs. EFR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVL.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.93%, smaller than the maximum EFR.TO drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVL.TO and EFR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVL.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.93% | -99.57% | +55.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -51.09% | +42.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | -59.28% | +41.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.10% | -64.59% | +46.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -90.62% | +89.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -81.44% | +75.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 25.20% | -22.98% |
Volatility
VVL.TO vs. EFR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) is 3.17%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a volatility of 26.66%. This indicates that VVL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVL.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 26.66% | -23.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 64.47% | -55.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 96.96% | -83.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 71.33% | -55.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 70.72% | -51.98% |
Dividends
VVL.TO vs. EFR.TO - Dividend Comparison
VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while EFR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD | 1.71% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 2.65% | 2.52% | 1.48% | 1.67% | 2.60% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VVL.TO and EFR.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for VVL.TO and EFR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer