VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO
VVL.TO (Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF) and CYBR.TO (Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - VVL.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while CYBR.TO is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Solactive Global Cyber Security Index Canadian Dollar Hedged. VVL.TO is actively managed, while CYBR.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VVL.TO returned 15.45%/yr vs 6.98%/yr for CYBR.TO. Their 0.33 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VVL.TO charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CYBR.TO.
Performance
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VVL.TO achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly lower than CYBR.TO's 31.37% return.
VVL.TO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- YTD
- 19.93%
- 1Y
- 36.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.64%
CYBR.TO
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- 6M
- 31.68%
- YTD
- 31.37%
- 1Y
- 23.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$239.84K | CA$197.23K | CA$250.21K | |
| CA$1.10M | CA$1.04M | CA$875.29K |
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF | 19.93% | 18.01% | 15.01% | 16.57% | 0.50% | 29.77% | -3.29% | 13.44% | -9.39% | 9.73% |
CYBR.TO Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units | 31.37% | 2.14% | 13.45% | 44.51% | -37.17% | 5.65% | 66.41% | 24.43% | 7.17% | 5.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between VVL.TO and CYBR.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017 | 0.33 |
The correlation between VVL.TO and CYBR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
-
Healthcare
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
-
Technology
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
Industrials
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
Energy
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
-
Communication Services
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
Basic Materials
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
-
Real Estate
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
Utilities
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF (VVL.TO) and Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VVL.TO | CYBR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.14 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 0.76 | +3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.44 | 1.59 | +13.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VVL.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.88%, roughly equal to the maximum CYBR.TO drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVL.TO and CYBR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VVL.TO | CYBR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.88% | -44.40% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.83% | -28.10% | +19.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -28.10% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -44.40% | +26.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -7.21% | +5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -12.68% | +6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 13.35% | -11.13% |
Volatility
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF (VVL.TO) is 3.73%, while Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that VVL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYBR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VVL.TO | CYBR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 8.61% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 25.60% | -16.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 29.98% | -16.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 27.91% | -11.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 26.64% | -7.86% |
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VVL.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CYBR.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Dividend Comparison
VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than CYBR.TO's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYBR.TO Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.39% | 0.22% | 0.13% | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF | 1.58% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 2.69% | 2.57% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 2.65% | 2.15% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VVL.TO and CYBR.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CYBR.TO.
VVL.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CYBR.TO is Cybersecurity. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VVL.TO and 0.60% for CYBR.TO.
Find the right allocation for VVL.TO and CYBR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer