PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF (VVL.TO) and Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VVL.TO achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly lower than CYBR.TO's 31.37% return.


VVL.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.41%
6M
13.59%
YTD
19.93%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
12.64%

CYBR.TO

1D
2.50%
1M
-3.86%
6M
31.68%
YTD
31.37%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$239.84KCA$197.23KCA$250.21K
CA$1.10MCA$1.04MCA$875.29K

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF
19.93%18.01%15.01%16.57%0.50%29.77%-3.29%13.44%-9.39%9.73%
CYBR.TO
Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units
31.37%2.14%13.45%44.51%-37.17%5.65%66.41%24.43%7.17%5.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VVL.TO and CYBR.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2017

0.33

The correlation between VVL.TO and CYBR.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VVL.TO
CYBR.TO

Financial Services

25.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%

-

Healthcare

10.8%

-

Technology

10.5%
87.4%

Industrials

9.8%
2.2%

Energy

9.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.5%

-

Communication Services

6.1%
10.0%

Basic Materials

6.0%

-

Real Estate

0.9%
0.4%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Financial Services

VVL.TO
25.3%
CYBR.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

VVL.TO
14.8%
CYBR.TO

-

Healthcare

VVL.TO
10.8%
CYBR.TO

-

Technology

VVL.TO
10.5%
CYBR.TO
87.4%

Industrials

VVL.TO
9.8%
CYBR.TO
2.2%

Energy

VVL.TO
9.4%
CYBR.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

VVL.TO
6.5%
CYBR.TO

-

Communication Services

VVL.TO
6.1%
CYBR.TO
10.0%

Basic Materials

VVL.TO
6.0%
CYBR.TO

-

Real Estate

VVL.TO
0.9%
CYBR.TO
0.4%

Utilities

VVL.TO
0.0%
CYBR.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VVL.TO
VVL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CYBR.TO
CYBR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CYBR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF (VVL.TO) and Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVL.TOCYBR.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.14

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

0.76

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.44

1.59

+13.85

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the CYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VVL.TO and CYBR.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VVL.TO drawdown since its inception was -43.88%, roughly equal to the maximum CYBR.TO drawdown of -44.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VVL.TO and CYBR.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVL.TOCYBR.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.88%

-44.40%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.83%

-28.10%

+19.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.07%

-28.10%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.07%

-44.40%

+26.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-7.21%

+5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-12.68%

+6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

13.35%

-11.13%

Volatility

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF (VVL.TO) is 3.73%, while Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units (CYBR.TO) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that VVL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYBR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVL.TOCYBR.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

8.61%

-4.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.47%

25.60%

-16.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

29.98%

-16.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

27.91%

-11.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

26.64%

-7.86%

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VVL.TO has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CYBR.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

VVL.TO vs. CYBR.TO - Dividend Comparison

VVL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than CYBR.TO's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CYBR.TO
Evolve Cyber Security Index Fund - Hedged Units
0.18%0.23%0.24%0.27%0.39%0.22%0.13%0.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF
1.58%1.89%2.19%2.69%2.57%1.50%1.70%2.65%2.15%1.35%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VVL.TO and CYBR.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CYBR.TO.

VVL.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while CYBR.TO is Cybersecurity. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for VVL.TO and 0.60% for CYBR.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VVL.TO and CYBR.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer