VV vs. SCHX
VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - VV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VV returned 15.17%/yr vs 15.02%/yr for SCHX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
VV vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VV having a 10.23% return and SCHX slightly higher at 10.34%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VV having a 15.17% annualized return and SCHX not far behind at 15.02%.
VV
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.17%
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 8.09%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
VV vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 10.23% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -19.91% | 27.41% | 21.04% | 31.25% | -4.46% | 22.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.34% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VV and SCHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 1.00 |
The correlation between VV and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
VV vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VV
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VV
SCHX
Financial Services
VV
SCHX
Communication Services
VV
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
VV
SCHX
Healthcare
VV
SCHX
Industrials
VV
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
VV
SCHX
Energy
VV
SCHX
Utilities
VV
SCHX
Real Estate
VV
SCHX
Basic Materials
VV
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VV vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
VV
SCHX
VV vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.33 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 9.98 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VV vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -34.33% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.21% | -9.02% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -19.04% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -25.41% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.28% | -34.33% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -1.04% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -3.95% | -2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.10% | +0.03% |
Volatility
VV vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 4.03% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 10.02% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.71% | 12.69% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 17.24% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 18.14% | +0.05% |
VV vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VV vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, which matches SCHX's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, VV and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SCHX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.17% vs 15.02% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 15.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VV.
VV and SCHX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.02%.
VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.03% for SCHX.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VV and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer