PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. SCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VV having a 10.23% return and SCHX slightly higher at 10.34%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VV having a 15.17% annualized return and SCHX not far behind at 15.02%.


VV

1D
-0.77%
1M
1.34%
6M
8.23%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
15.17%

SCHX

1D
-0.71%
1M
1.36%
6M
8.09%
YTD
10.34%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
15.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.23%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
10.34%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and SCHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

1.00

The correlation between VV and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

VV vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
SCHX

Technology

39.5%
38.3%

Financial Services

11.0%
11.1%

Communication Services

10.8%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
9.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

7.9%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.4%

Energy

3.2%
3.2%

Utilities

2.0%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.5%
1.8%

Technology

VV
39.5%
SCHX
38.3%

Financial Services

VV
11.0%
SCHX
11.1%

Communication Services

VV
10.8%
SCHX
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.7%
SCHX
9.8%

Healthcare

VV
8.4%
SCHX
8.4%

Industrials

VV
7.9%
SCHX
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.4%
SCHX
4.4%

Energy

VV
3.2%
SCHX
3.2%

Utilities

VV
2.0%
SCHX
2.1%

Real Estate

VV
1.6%
SCHX
2.0%

Basic Materials

VV
1.5%
SCHX
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVSCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.33

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

9.98

+0.02

VV vs. SCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the SCHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and SCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VV vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and SCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVSCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-34.33%

-20.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-9.02%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-19.04%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-25.41%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-34.33%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-1.04%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-3.95%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.10%

+0.03%

Volatility

VV vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVSCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.03%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

10.02%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

12.69%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

17.24%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.14%

+0.05%

VV vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VV vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, which matches SCHX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.03%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, VV and SCHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SCHX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs SCHX's -34.33%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.17% vs 15.02% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 15.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VV.

VV and SCHX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.02%.

VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.03% for SCHX.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and SCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer