PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. RETSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. RETSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VV having a 10.23% return and RETSX slightly lower at 9.72%. Over the past 10 years, VV has outperformed RETSX with an annualized return of 15.17%, while RETSX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.11% annualized return.


VV

1D
-0.77%
1M
1.34%
6M
8.23%
YTD
10.23%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
15.17%

RETSX

1D
0.47%
1M
2.18%
6M
7.62%
YTD
9.72%
1Y
18.46%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
13.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. RETSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.23%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%
RETSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund
9.72%14.45%20.43%24.74%-18.96%24.82%17.70%28.94%-6.97%21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and RETSX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.98

The correlation between VV and RETSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. RETSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RETSX
RETSX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RETSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RETSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. RETSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VVRETSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.94

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

8.13

+1.87

VV vs. RETSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the RETSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and RETSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VV vs. RETSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum RETSX drawdown of -57.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and RETSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVRETSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-57.35%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-9.29%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-18.79%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-25.62%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-33.52%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.09%

-1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-10.51%

+3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

2.22%

-0.09%

Volatility

VV vs. RETSX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVRETSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.17%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

9.67%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

12.29%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

16.80%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

17.78%

+0.41%

VV vs. RETSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RETSX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

VV vs. RETSX - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than RETSX's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RETSX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund
0.40%0.44%0.49%0.54%0.59%0.14%0.47%0.78%0.90%1.02%0.84%0.76%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
1.02%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, VV and RETSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RETSX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to VV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs RETSX's -57.35%.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and RETSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer