RETSX vs. AGTHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RETSX (Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund) and AGTHX (American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A) are both mutual funds - RETSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while AGTHX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Equity. Over the past 10 years, RETSX returned 13.31%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for AGTHX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RETSX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for AGTHX.

Performance

RETSX vs. AGTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RETSX having a 9.76% return and AGTHX slightly higher at 10.09%. Over the past 10 years, RETSX has underperformed AGTHX with an annualized return of 13.31%, while AGTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.97% annualized return.

RETSX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 5.72%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: 19.33%
• 5Y*: 11.38%
• 10Y*: 13.31%

AGTHX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 6.81%
• YTD: 10.09%
• 6M: 9.70%
• 1Y: 26.21%
• 3Y*: 25.16%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 15.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RETSX vs. AGTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RETSX Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund	9.76%	14.45%	20.43%	24.74%	-18.96%	24.82%	17.70%	28.94%	-6.97%	21.51%
AGTHX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A	10.09%	19.73%	28.02%	37.22%	-30.75%	19.32%	37.83%	28.16%	-3.15%	26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RETSX and AGTHX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997	0.93

The correlation between RETSX and AGTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RETSX vs. AGTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETSX

RETSX Risk / Return Rank: 53
RETSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RETSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
RETSX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RETSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RETSX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

AGTHX

AGTHX Risk / Return Rank: 34
AGTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
AGTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
AGTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AGTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
AGTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETSX vs. AGTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RETSX	AGTHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.77	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	2.43	+0.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.32	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	1.95	+0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.86	7.61	+4.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RETSX vs. AGTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the AGTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETSX and AGTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RETSX	AGTHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	1.77	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.62	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.81	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.71	-0.25

Drawdowns

RETSX vs. AGTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETSX drawdown since its inception was -57.35%, which is greater than AGTHX's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETSX and AGTHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RETSX	AGTHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.35%	-51.91%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.29%	-13.76%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.79%	-21.57%	+2.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.62%	-36.38%	+10.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.52%	-36.38%	+2.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.33%	+0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.54%	-9.20%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	3.52%	-1.40%

Volatility

RETSX vs. AGTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund (RETSX) is 2.82%, while American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A (AGTHX) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that RETSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RETSX	AGTHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	3.67%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	11.65%	-2.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.71%	15.15%	-3.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	20.25%	-3.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.82%	19.69%	-1.87%

RETSX vs. AGTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than AGTHX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

RETSX vs. AGTHX - Dividend Comparison

RETSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than AGTHX's 9.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AGTHX American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class A	9.71%	10.69%	8.99%	7.40%	4.05%	8.18%	4.30%	7.15%	11.99%	7.03%	6.61%	8.87%
RETSX Russell Investment Tax-Managed U.S. Large Cap Fund	0.40%	0.44%	0.49%	0.54%	0.59%	0.14%	0.47%	0.78%	0.90%	1.02%	0.84%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RETSX and AGTHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, RETSX and AGTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RETSX or AGTHX?

AGTHX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to RETSX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RETSX dropped -57.35% vs AGTHX's -51.91%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RETSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.