PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VV vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VV achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 11.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VV having a 15.58% annualized return and ITOT not far behind at 15.01%.


VV

1D
-0.72%
1M
5.19%
YTD
10.69%
6M
10.54%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
15.58%

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
10.69%18.11%25.25%27.18%-19.91%27.41%21.04%31.25%-4.46%22.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between VV and ITOT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.98

The correlation between VV and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VV
ITOT

Technology

35.9%
33.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.1%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
9.0%

Industrials

8.0%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.7%

Energy

3.6%
3.7%

Utilities

2.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
2.1%

Technology

VV
35.9%
ITOT
33.8%

Financial Services

VV
11.8%
ITOT
12.1%

Communication Services

VV
11.2%
ITOT
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VV
9.8%
ITOT
10.1%

Healthcare

VV
8.6%
ITOT
9.0%

Industrials

VV
8.0%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

VV
4.8%
ITOT
4.7%

Energy

VV
3.6%
ITOT
3.7%

Utilities

VV
2.7%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

VV
1.7%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

VV
1.6%
ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VV
VV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VVITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.17

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

14.57

-0.71

VV vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VV Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VV and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VVITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.32

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.74

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.82

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Drawdowns

VV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VV drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, roughly equal to the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VV and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VVITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-55.20%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-8.90%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-19.44%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

-25.36%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.28%

-35.00%

+0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.73%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-6.97%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.94%

+0.07%

Volatility

VV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) is 2.84%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that VV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VVITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.99%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

9.13%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

12.20%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.36%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.19%

18.26%

-0.07%

VV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, which matches ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
VV
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
0.98%1.08%1.24%1.41%1.66%1.19%1.46%1.81%2.09%1.75%1.98%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VV and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to VV (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VV dropped -54.81% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, VV leads with 15.58% vs 15.01% for ITOT. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VV has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 15.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VV.

VV and ITOT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.98%.

VV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. VV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VV and 0.03% for ITOT.

VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VV and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer