VUSV vs. ISCMF
VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. VUSV is actively managed, while ISCMF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. VUSV charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
VUSV vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSV achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 11.96% return.
VUSV
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.88%
- 6M
- 11.96%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUSV vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 9.94% | 5.62% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 11.96% | 7.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSV and ISCMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSV vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
VUSV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISCMF
VUSV vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUSV | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.89 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUSV vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSV drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSV and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSV | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -25.42% | +18.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -13.68% | +13.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -13.31% | +12.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.08% | — |
Volatility
VUSV vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSV | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.78% | 19.62% | -7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.78% | 14.84% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.78% | 14.84% | -3.06% |
VUSV vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUSV vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
VUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUSV and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VUSV.
VUSV has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
VUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VUSV and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for VUSV and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer