VUSV vs. FNDX
VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. VUSV is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VUSV charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.
Performance
VUSV vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 15.35% return.
VUSV
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 15.35%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 33.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
VUSV vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 8.98% | 5.48% |
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 15.35% | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSV and FNDX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSV vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank
VUSV
FNDX
VUSV vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUSV | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.48 | 0.80 | +1.68 |
Drawdowns
VUSV vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSV drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSV and FNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSV | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -37.72% | +30.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.30% | -3.55% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.55% | — |
Volatility
VUSV vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSV | FNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.03% | 10.22% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 15.18% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 17.50% | -5.47% |
VUSV vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUSV vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison
VUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than FNDX's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.82% | 2.07% | 1.64% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 2.40% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.01% |
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUSV and FNDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VUSV.
FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VUSV and 0.25% for FNDX.
Find the right allocation for VUSV and FNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer