VUSV vs. FCG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) and FCG (First Trust Natural Gas ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while FCG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index. VUSV is actively managed, while FCG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. VUSV charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FCG.

Performance

VUSV vs. FCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSV achieves a 7.34% return, which is significantly lower than FCG's 17.24% return.

VUSV

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 7.34%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCG

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: -9.95%
• YTD: 17.24%
• 6M: 18.20%
• 1Y: 12.39%
• 3Y*: 10.11%
• 5Y*: 14.16%
• 10Y*: 3.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSV vs. FCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	7.34%	5.62%
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF	17.24%	-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSV and FCG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

VUSV vs. FCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FCG

FCG Risk / Return Rank: 16
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 15
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSV vs. FCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VUSV	FCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.46	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.09	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.70	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.05	—

Drawdowns

VUSV vs. FCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSV drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum FCG drawdown of -97.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSV and FCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUSV	FCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-97.20%	+90.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.44%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.33%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.84%	-76.36%	+74.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-65.39%	+64.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VUSV	FCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.37%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.10%	27.35%	-15.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.10%	33.43%	-21.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.10%	38.32%	-26.22%

VUSV vs. FCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FCG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUSV vs. FCG - Dividend Comparison

VUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than FCG's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF	2.34%	2.86%	2.76%	3.25%	3.04%	1.73%	3.82%	2.87%	1.46%	1.56%	1.70%	4.79%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUSV and FCG in my portfolio?

VUSV and FCG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUSV or FCG?

On fees, VUSV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUSV or FCG?

VUSV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VUSV or FCG?

FCG has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.

What is the main difference between VUSV and FCG?

VUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FCG is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VUSV and 0.60% for FCG.