VUSV vs. BCI

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. VUSV is actively managed, while BCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. VUSV charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.

Performance

VUSV vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSV achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 17.72% return.

VUSV

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 1.13%
• 6M: 5.51%
• YTD: 9.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.67%
• 6M: 15.01%
• YTD: 17.72%
• 1Y: 26.19%
• 3Y*: 11.78%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSV vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	9.94%	5.62%
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	17.72%	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSV and BCI is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

VUSV vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCI

BCI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSV vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VUSV	BCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.58	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.12	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.23	—

Drawdowns

VUSV vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSV drawdown since its inception was -7.06%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSV and BCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	VUSV	BCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-32.69%	+25.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-11.27%	+10.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.23%	-11.99%	+10.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VUSV	BCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	17.24%	-5.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.78%	16.81%	-5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.78%	15.66%	-3.88%

VUSV vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSV has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

VUSV vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

VUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BCI's 14.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF	14.01%	16.49%	3.29%	3.93%	19.98%	19.43%	0.68%	1.47%	1.13%	5.02%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VUSV and BCI in my portfolio?

VUSV and BCI have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VUSV or BCI?

On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VUSV or BCI?

BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VUSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VUSV or BCI?

BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.01%, compared with 0.18% for VUSV.

What is the main difference between VUSV and BCI?

VUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VUSV and 0.26% for BCI.