VUSI vs. BCI
VUSI (Voya Ultra Short Income ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUSI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Voya, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. VUSI is actively managed, while BCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. VUSI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
VUSI vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUSI achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 15.26% return.
VUSI
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -9.78%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 13.54%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
VUSI vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VUSI Voya Ultra Short Income ETF | -0.09% | 0.66% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 15.26% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUSI and BCI is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUSI vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
VUSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCI
VUSI vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Ultra Short Income ETF (VUSI) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VUSI | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VUSI vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUSI drawdown since its inception was -0.86%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSI and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUSI | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -32.69% | +31.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -13.12% | +12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.28% | -11.99% | +11.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility
VUSI vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUSI | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37% | 17.20% | -15.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.37% | 16.79% | -15.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.37% | 15.65% | -14.28% |
VUSI vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUSI vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
VUSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than BCI's 14.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.30% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
VUSI Voya Ultra Short Income ETF | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUSI and BCI have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUSI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUSI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for BCI.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.30%, compared with 0.49% for VUSI.
VUSI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Voya and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VUSI and 0.26% for BCI.
Find the right allocation for VUSI and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer