PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUSA.L is traded in GBP, while SPMV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUSA.L achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly higher than SPMV.L's 4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, VUSA.L has outperformed SPMV.L with an annualized return of 14.49%, while SPMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


VUSA.L

1D
-0.97%
1M
-0.93%
6M
7.48%
YTD
9.06%
1Y
19.69%
3Y*
18.26%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
14.49%

SPMV.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
-1.09%
6M
3.85%
YTD
4.39%
1Y
10.21%
3Y*
11.66%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
9.06%9.39%27.33%19.82%-9.02%30.97%13.65%26.53%-0.10%10.72%
SPMV.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.39%3.60%20.76%4.44%-0.48%26.16%4.26%26.25%0.26%6.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VUSA.L and SPMV.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.84

The correlation between VUSA.L and SPMV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUSA.L
VUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV.L
SPMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) and iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUSA.LSPMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.97

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

5.80

+4.09

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SPMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUSA.L and SPMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMV.L drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUSA.L and SPMV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSA.LSPMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.48%

-25.15%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-5.16%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.93%

-14.55%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-14.55%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

-25.15%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-1.54%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-3.39%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.76%

+0.23%

Volatility

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (VUSA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SPMV.L) at 2.69%. This indicates that VUSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSA.LSPMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

2.69%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

7.28%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.97%

9.59%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

12.68%

+1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.52%

14.17%

+1.35%

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUSA.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMV.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUSA.L vs. SPMV.L - Dividend Comparison

VUSA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while SPMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMV.L
iShares Edge S&P 500 Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUSA.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.89%0.95%1.00%1.24%1.41%1.04%1.44%1.50%1.72%1.61%1.58%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUSA.L and SPMV.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUSA.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUSA.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPMV.L.

VUSA.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while SPMV.L tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Net in USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUSA.L and 0.20% for SPMV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUSA.L and SPMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer