PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUS vs. PSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUS vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF (VUS) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUS achieves a 19.89% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.25% return.


VUS

1D
-0.03%
1M
3.42%
YTD
19.89%
6M
20.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSCX

1D
0.14%
1M
1.81%
YTD
5.25%
6M
6.09%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUS vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VUS and PSCX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.83

VUS vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUS
PSCX

Technology

34.7%
33.2%

Industrials

11.5%
8.4%

Real Estate

10.4%
2.0%

Financial Services

9.5%
12.5%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.6%

Energy

6.0%
4.2%

Communication Services

5.3%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
10.0%

Utilities

3.3%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
5.4%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.9%

Technology

VUS
34.7%
PSCX
33.2%

Industrials

VUS
11.5%
PSCX
8.4%

Real Estate

VUS
10.4%
PSCX
2.0%

Financial Services

VUS
9.5%
PSCX
12.5%

Healthcare

VUS
8.3%
PSCX
9.6%

Energy

VUS
6.0%
PSCX
4.2%

Communication Services

VUS
5.3%
PSCX
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VUS
5.2%
PSCX
10.0%

Utilities

VUS
3.3%
PSCX
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

VUS
3.2%
PSCX
5.4%

Basic Materials

VUS
2.7%
PSCX
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUS vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUS

PSCX
PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUS vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF (VUS) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VUS vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSPSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.20

1.28

+1.93

Drawdowns

VUS vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUS drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, smaller than the maximum PSCX drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUS and PSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSPSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-10.20%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

0.00%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-1.86%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

Volatility

VUS vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSPSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.58%

5.52%

+9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

7.07%

+7.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

6.96%

+7.62%

VUS vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUS vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

VUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


VUS and PSCX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

VUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VUS and 0.75% for PSCX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUS and PSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer