PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUS vs. BDGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUS vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF (VUS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUS achieves a 19.93% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 5.56% return.


VUS

1D
-0.58%
1M
4.84%
YTD
19.93%
6M
20.90%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDGS

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.33%
YTD
5.56%
6M
5.60%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUS vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VUS
Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF
19.93%0.81%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
5.56%0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VUS and BDGS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.68

VUS vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUS
BDGS

Technology

34.7%
37.4%

Industrials

11.5%
6.6%

Real Estate

10.4%
1.5%

Financial Services

9.5%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
7.5%

Energy

6.0%
2.6%

Communication Services

5.3%
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
10.9%

Utilities

3.3%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
4.1%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.5%

Technology

VUS
34.7%
BDGS
37.4%

Industrials

VUS
11.5%
BDGS
6.6%

Real Estate

VUS
10.4%
BDGS
1.5%

Financial Services

VUS
9.5%
BDGS
9.3%

Healthcare

VUS
8.3%
BDGS
7.5%

Energy

VUS
6.0%
BDGS
2.6%

Communication Services

VUS
5.3%
BDGS
16.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VUS
5.2%
BDGS
10.9%

Utilities

VUS
3.3%
BDGS
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

VUS
3.2%
BDGS
4.1%

Basic Materials

VUS
2.7%
BDGS
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUS vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUS

BDGS
BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUS vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF (VUS) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VUS vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUSBDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.23

1.75

+1.48

Drawdowns

VUS vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUS drawdown since its inception was -9.45%, roughly equal to the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUS and BDGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUSBDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-9.12%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.89%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-0.64%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

Volatility

VUS vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUSBDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

6.08%

+8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.63%

8.20%

+6.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

8.20%

+6.43%

VUS vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

VUS vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

VUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
0.52%0.55%1.81%0.84%
VUS
Virtus U.S. Dividend ETF
0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUS and BDGS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

VUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for VUS and 0.87% for BDGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUS and BDGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer