PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUKG.L is traded in GBP, while IMSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IMSU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUKG.L achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than IMSU.L's 13.42% return.


VUKG.L

1D
1.55%
1M
1.75%
YTD
6.61%
6M
9.80%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*

IMSU.L

1D
3.01%
1M
0.18%
YTD
13.42%
6M
14.88%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
6.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUKG.L
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
6.61%27.30%13.56%11.46%9.82%22.31%-8.50%9.90%
IMSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
13.42%3.37%0.69%6.26%-1.35%28.63%16.34%13.24%

Correlation

The correlation between VUKG.L and IMSU.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.63

The correlation between VUKG.L and IMSU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUKG.L
IMSU.L

Financial Services

24.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

13.9%

-

Industrials

13.7%

-

Healthcare

13.6%

-

Energy

11.7%

-

Basic Materials

8.5%
91.4%

Utilities

5.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
8.6%

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

0.8%

-

Financial Services

VUKG.L
24.5%
IMSU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VUKG.L
13.9%
IMSU.L

-

Industrials

VUKG.L
13.7%
IMSU.L

-

Healthcare

VUKG.L
13.6%
IMSU.L

-

Energy

VUKG.L
11.7%
IMSU.L

-

Basic Materials

VUKG.L
8.5%
IMSU.L
91.4%

Utilities

VUKG.L
5.3%
IMSU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

VUKG.L
4.7%
IMSU.L
8.6%

Communication Services

VUKG.L
2.6%
IMSU.L

-

Real Estate

VUKG.L
0.9%
IMSU.L

-

Technology

VUKG.L
0.8%
IMSU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUKG.L
VUKG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VUKG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUKG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUKG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VUKG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUKG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

IMSU.L
IMSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IMSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IMSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUKG.LIMSU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.86

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.72

6.07

+1.65

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUKG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the IMSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUKG.L and IMSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUKG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.32%, roughly equal to the maximum IMSU.L drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUKG.L and IMSU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUKG.LIMSU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.32%

-33.22%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-10.76%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.23%

-25.16%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.23%

-25.16%

+12.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-2.70%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-11.19%

+7.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.31%

-0.58%

Volatility

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VUKG.L) is 3.52%, while iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IMSU.L) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that VUKG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUKG.LIMSU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

5.66%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

12.26%

-2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.93%

15.12%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

21.54%

-8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.22%

24.98%

-8.76%

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUKG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IMSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUKG.L vs. IMSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUKG.L nor IMSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IMSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUKG.L
Vanguard FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating
0.00%0.79%3.67%3.71%3.84%3.84%3.06%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUKG.L and IMSU.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUKG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUKG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IMSU.L.

VUKG.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IMSU.L is Materials. VUKG.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IMSU.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VUKG.L and 0.15% for IMSU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUKG.L and IMSU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer