VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO
VUDV.TO (Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF) and LLYH.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Dividend funds. VUDV.TO is passively managed, while LLYH.TO is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUDV.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LLYH.TO.
Performance
VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VUDV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLYH.TO
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 8.94% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 17.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUDV.TO and LLYH.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VUDV.TO
LLYH.TO
VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VUDV.TO) and Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUDV.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.57 | 0.24 | +7.33 |
Drawdowns
VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.68%, smaller than the maximum LLYH.TO drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUDV.TO and LLYH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUDV.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -31.00% | +30.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.39% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -10.18% | +10.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.64% | — |
Volatility
VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUDV.TO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.57% | 33.04% | -25.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 33.82% | -26.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 33.82% | -26.25% |
VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUDV.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than LLYH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VUDV.TO vs. LLYH.TO - Dividend Comparison
VUDV.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LLYH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 17.81% | 17.54% | 6.17% |
VUDV.TO Vanguard U.S. High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUDV.TO and LLYH.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUDV.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LLYH.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for VUDV.TO and 0.40% for LLYH.TO.
Find the right allocation for VUDV.TO and LLYH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer