PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAG.L is traded in GBP, while BCOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCOG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAG.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than BCOG.L's 24.98% return.


VUAG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.56%
6M
9.91%
1Y
29.04%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
14.93%
10Y*

BCOG.L

1D
-1.35%
1M
-2.79%
YTD
24.98%
6M
23.49%
1Y
38.11%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
10.56%9.36%27.33%19.67%-8.88%30.97%201.05%9.30%
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF
24.98%8.16%6.13%-12.32%29.36%29.04%-6.24%-2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAG.L and BCOG.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019

0.20

The correlation between VUAG.L and BCOG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VUAG.L
BCOG.L

Technology

35.7%
5.6%

Financial Services

11.6%
17.8%

Communication Services

11.3%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
12.9%

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

8.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
9.7%

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

1.9%
5.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
35.8%

Technology

VUAG.L
35.7%
BCOG.L
5.6%

Financial Services

VUAG.L
11.6%
BCOG.L
17.8%

Communication Services

VUAG.L
11.3%
BCOG.L
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VUAG.L
10.2%
BCOG.L
12.9%

Healthcare

VUAG.L
8.5%
BCOG.L

-

Industrials

VUAG.L
8.3%
BCOG.L

-

Consumer Defensive

VUAG.L
4.9%
BCOG.L
9.7%

Energy

VUAG.L
3.5%
BCOG.L

-

Utilities

VUAG.L
2.4%
BCOG.L

-

Real Estate

VUAG.L
1.9%
BCOG.L
5.8%

Basic Materials

VUAG.L
1.8%
BCOG.L
35.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAG.L
VUAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOG.L
BCOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VUAG.LBCOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.37

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

4.43

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

10.23

+4.73

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the BCOG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAG.L and BCOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VUAG.LBCOG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.05

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.74

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.49

+0.40

Drawdowns

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, smaller than the maximum BCOG.L drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and BCOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAG.LBCOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.61%

-28.15%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.11%

-8.57%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.88%

-14.48%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.88%

-27.76%

+6.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-5.16%

+4.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-11.67%

+8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.72%

-1.78%

Volatility

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) is 2.62%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that VUAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAG.LBCOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

6.06%

-3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.17%

15.89%

-8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

18.51%

-7.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

16.89%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.09%

15.71%

+20.38%

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VUAG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BCOG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAG.L nor BCOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BCOG.L
L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAG.L
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%71.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAG.L and BCOG.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BCOG.L.

VUAG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while BCOG.L is Commodities. VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while BCOG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAG.L and 0.15% for BCOG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAG.L and BCOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer