VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L
VUAG.L (Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) and BCOG.L (L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VUAG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while BCOG.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VUAG.L returned 14.93%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for BCOG.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VUAG.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BCOG.L.
Performance
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VUAG.L is traded in GBP, while BCOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BCOG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VUAG.L achieves a 10.56% return, which is significantly lower than BCOG.L's 24.98% return.
VUAG.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
BCOG.L
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- 24.98%
- 6M
- 23.49%
- 1Y
- 38.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- —
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 10.56% | 9.36% | 27.33% | 19.67% | -8.88% | 30.97% | 201.05% | 9.30% |
BCOG.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF | 24.98% | 8.16% | 6.13% | -12.32% | 29.36% | 29.04% | -6.24% | -2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between VUAG.L and BCOG.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2019 | 0.20 |
The correlation between VUAG.L and BCOG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
Financial Services
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
Communication Services
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
Consumer Cyclical
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
Healthcare
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
-
Industrials
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
-
Consumer Defensive
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
Energy
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
-
Utilities
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
-
Real Estate
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
Basic Materials
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L — Risk / Return Rank
VUAG.L
BCOG.L
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) and L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VUAG.L | BCOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | 4.43 | -0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.96 | 10.23 | +4.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VUAG.L | BCOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 2.05 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | 0.74 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.49 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VUAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.61%, smaller than the maximum BCOG.L drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAG.L and BCOG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VUAG.L | BCOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.61% | -28.15% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.11% | -8.57% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.88% | -14.48% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.88% | -27.76% | +6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -5.16% | +4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -11.67% | +8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.72% | -1.78% |
Volatility
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (VUAG.L) is 2.62%, while L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF (BCOG.L) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that VUAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VUAG.L | BCOG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 6.06% | -3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 15.89% | -8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 18.51% | -7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 16.89% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.09% | 15.71% | +20.38% |
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VUAG.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BCOG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VUAG.L vs. BCOG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VUAG.L nor BCOG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCOG.L L&G All Commodities UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUAG.L Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 71.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VUAG.L and BCOG.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUAG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUAG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for BCOG.L.
VUAG.L is categorized as S&P 500, while BCOG.L is Commodities. VUAG.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while BCOG.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VUAG.L and 0.15% for BCOG.L.
Find the right allocation for VUAG.L and BCOG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer