PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VUAA.DE is traded in EUR, while IB01.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IB01.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VUAA.DE achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than IB01.L's 3.09% return.


VUAA.DE

1D
1.54%
1M
0.58%
YTD
9.96%
6M
10.78%
1Y
24.90%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
14.30%
10Y*

IB01.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.76%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.26%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
2.31%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VUAA.DE
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF
9.96%4.69%32.69%22.51%-14.29%40.75%5.89%
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
3.09%-8.05%12.19%1.78%7.34%6.56%-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VUAA.DE and IB01.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020

0.14

The correlation between VUAA.DE and IB01.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.27 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VUAA.DE
VUAA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VUAA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUAA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUAA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VUAA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUAA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VUAA.DEIB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.12

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

1.08

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.44

2.61

+9.83

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VUAA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the IB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VUAA.DE and IB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VUAA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VUAA.DE and IB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VUAA.DEIB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-13.53%

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-3.83%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.33%

-11.53%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.33%

-11.76%

-11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-6.34%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-5.99%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.58%

+0.38%

Volatility

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF (VUAA.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 1.30%. This indicates that VUAA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VUAA.DEIB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

1.30%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

4.31%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

6.21%

+5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

7.59%

+7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

7.37%

+10.24%

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VUAA.DE and IB01.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VUAA.DE vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VUAA.DE nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUAA.DE
Vanguard S&P 500 UCITS USD Acc ETF
0.00%0.00%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


VUAA.DE and IB01.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUAA.DE and IB01.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

VUAA.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. VUAA.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VUAA.DE and IB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer