PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWG vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWG vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWG has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 12.12%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.23% annualized return.


VTWG

1D
-1.45%
1M
4.36%
YTD
20.43%
6M
16.97%
1Y
40.10%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
12.12%

VXUS

1D
-3.04%
1M
0.39%
YTD
12.51%
6M
12.35%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWG vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
20.43%13.07%15.15%18.90%-26.49%2.84%34.72%28.75%-9.45%22.27%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
12.51%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWG and VXUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.71

The correlation between VTWG and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWG vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWG
VXUS

Technology

25.8%
21.0%

Industrials

23.1%
15.6%

Healthcare

22.0%
6.8%

Financial Services

7.8%
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.2%

Basic Materials

4.0%
7.6%

Energy

3.1%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.2%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.4%

Utilities

0.6%
3.0%

Technology

VTWG
25.8%
VXUS
21.0%

Industrials

VTWG
23.1%
VXUS
15.6%

Healthcare

VTWG
22.0%
VXUS
6.8%

Financial Services

VTWG
7.8%
VXUS
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWG
7.1%
VXUS
8.2%

Basic Materials

VTWG
4.0%
VXUS
7.6%

Energy

VTWG
3.1%
VXUS
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

VTWG
2.3%
VXUS
4.8%

Communication Services

VTWG
2.2%
VXUS
4.4%

Real Estate

VTWG
2.0%
VXUS
2.4%

Utilities

VTWG
0.6%
VXUS
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWG vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWG
VTWG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VTWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWG vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWGVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.62

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

10.07

-0.35

VTWG vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWG Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWG and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWG vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWGVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-35.97%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-11.27%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.58%

-13.58%

-15.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-29.44%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-35.97%

-6.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-3.04%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-8.20%

-2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

2.93%

+1.21%

Volatility

VTWG vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 7.07%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWGVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

7.07%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.92%

14.44%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.34%

16.36%

+5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.67%

16.27%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

17.03%

+7.24%

VTWG vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTWG vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than VXUS's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTWG
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF
0.59%0.64%0.55%0.79%0.71%0.54%0.48%0.72%0.72%0.64%0.96%0.72%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.59%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWG and VXUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWG has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to VXUS (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VTWG leads with 12.12% vs 10.23% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VTWG.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.59% for VTWG.

VTWG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWG and 0.05% for VXUS.

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWG and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer