VTWAX vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

VTWAX (Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both funds - VTWAX is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTWAX returned 10.37%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTWAX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWAX achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 0.30% return.

VTWAX

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 9.24%
• 6M: 10.08%
• 1Y: 24.85%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -8.41%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 30.55%
• 3Y*: 30.08%
• 5Y*: 17.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VTWAX Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares	9.24%	22.43%	16.43%	21.85%	-18.02%	18.17%	16.67%	17.53%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.30%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	15.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWAX and GLDM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2019	0.16

The correlation between VTWAX and GLDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VTWAX	GLDM
Technology	27.8%	-
Financial Services	15.9%	-
Industrials	12.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	-
Communication Services	8.3%	-
Healthcare	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	-
Energy	4.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.2%	100.0%
Utilities	2.7%	-
Real Estate	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

VTWAX vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWAX

VTWAX Risk / Return Rank: 52
VTWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
VTWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VTWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
VTWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
VTWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 34
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTWAX	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.15	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	1.54	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.23	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	1.53	+1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.96	3.85	+8.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWAX and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTWAX	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	1.15	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	1.00	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.99	-0.25

Drawdowns

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWAX drawdown since its inception was -34.20%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWAX and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTWAX	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.20%	-21.63%	-12.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-20.00%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.43%	-20.00%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.40%	-20.92%	-5.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.46%	-19.80%	+16.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-6.24%	+0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	7.96%	-5.80%

Volatility

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTWAX) is 4.45%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that VTWAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTWAX	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	5.65%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.34%	23.31%	-12.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.78%	26.65%	-13.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.77%	17.98%	-2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.22%	16.89%	+1.33%

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWAX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTWAX vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

VTWAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTWAX Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund Admiral Shares	1.61%	1.80%	1.92%	2.06%	2.17%	1.79%	1.64%	2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTWAX and GLDM in my portfolio?

VTWAX and GLDM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTWAX or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to VTWAX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWAX dropped -34.20% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTWAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.