PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTV vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTV vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VTV having a 12.30% return and VWO slightly lower at 12.22%. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 12.48%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.


VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%

VWO

1D
-1.41%
1M
2.72%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.79%
1Y
30.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTV vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
12.22%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VTV and VWO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2005

0.70

The correlation between VTV and VWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTV vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTV
VWO

Financial Services

22.3%
19.5%

Healthcare

14.5%
3.9%

Industrials

14.0%
8.0%

Technology

13.4%
29.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.4%
3.7%

Energy

8.1%
4.6%

Utilities

5.2%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
10.7%

Communication Services

3.3%
7.1%

Basic Materials

3.1%
8.0%

Real Estate

2.8%
2.2%

Financial Services

VTV
22.3%
VWO
19.5%

Healthcare

VTV
14.5%
VWO
3.9%

Industrials

VTV
14.0%
VWO
8.0%

Technology

VTV
13.4%
VWO
29.6%

Consumer Defensive

VTV
9.4%
VWO
3.7%

Energy

VTV
8.1%
VWO
4.6%

Utilities

VTV
5.2%
VWO
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VTV
4.0%
VWO
10.7%

Communication Services

VTV
3.3%
VWO
7.1%

Basic Materials

VTV
3.1%
VWO
8.0%

Real Estate

VTV
2.8%
VWO
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTV vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTV vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTVVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.15

2.76

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.69

9.96

+5.73

VTV vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTV and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTVVWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.94

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.30

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.46

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.27

+0.24

Drawdowns

VTV vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-67.68%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.35%

-11.17%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

-17.37%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-32.64%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.78%

-36.39%

-0.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.41%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-15.82%

+7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

3.09%

-1.41%

Volatility

VTV vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.52%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

5.61%

-3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.55%

13.22%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.11%

15.89%

-5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

17.37%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

19.20%

-2.53%

VTV vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTV vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than VWO's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.40%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTV and VWO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 8.85% for VWO. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VWO.

VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.08% for VWO.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTV and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer