VTV vs. SCHF
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.48%/yr vs 10.07%/yr for SCHF. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
VTV vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than SCHF's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 12.48%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- YTD
- 16.94%
- 1Y
- 24.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.70%
SCHF
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 24.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $203.16M | $207.38M | $210.77M | |
| $654.06M | $690.11M | $596.84M |
VTV vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 16.94% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 13.16% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and SCHF is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VTV and SCHF shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTV vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
SCHF
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
VTV
SCHF
Technology
VTV
SCHF
Healthcare
VTV
SCHF
Industrials
VTV
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
VTV
SCHF
Energy
VTV
SCHF
Utilities
VTV
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
SCHF
Basic Materials
VTV
SCHF
Communication Services
VTV
SCHF
Real Estate
VTV
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
SCHF
VTV vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.26 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 2.13 | +1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.23 | 7.94 | +7.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTV vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -34.87% | -24.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -11.48% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -13.41% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -29.14% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -34.87% | -1.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.84% | +3.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -7.34% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 3.07% | -1.40% |
Volatility
VTV vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is 2.48%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that VTV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 4.77% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.59% | 15.23% | -7.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.28% | 17.16% | -6.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 16.64% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 17.02% | -0.41% |
VTV vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than SCHF's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.12% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.85% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and SCHF have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to VTV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 10.07% for SCHF. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.06% for SCHF.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer