VTV vs. NEAR
VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) and NEAR (iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index, while NEAR is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by iShares. VTV is passively managed, while NEAR is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTV returned 12.42%/yr vs 2.82%/yr for NEAR. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for NEAR.
Performance
VTV vs. NEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTV achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than NEAR's 0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, VTV has outperformed NEAR with an annualized return of 12.42%, while NEAR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.82% annualized return.
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
NEAR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.82%
VTV vs. NEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
NEAR iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 0.53% | 5.90% | 5.09% | 7.42% | 0.41% | 0.32% | 1.39% | 3.55% | 1.71% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTV and NEAR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2013 | 0.04 |
Over the past year, VTV and NEAR have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.
VTV vs. NEAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTV
NEAR
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VTV
NEAR
Healthcare
VTV
NEAR
-
Industrials
VTV
NEAR
-
Technology
VTV
NEAR
-
Consumer Defensive
VTV
NEAR
-
Energy
VTV
NEAR
-
Utilities
VTV
NEAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
VTV
NEAR
-
Communication Services
VTV
NEAR
Basic Materials
VTV
NEAR
-
Real Estate
VTV
NEAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTV vs. NEAR — Risk / Return Rank
VTV
NEAR
VTV vs. NEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) and iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTV | NEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.63 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.03 | 3.65 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.20 | 16.68 | -1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTV | NEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 3.05 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 2.86 | -2.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 1.14 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.08 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
VTV vs. NEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTV drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, which is greater than NEAR's maximum drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTV and NEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTV | NEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -9.61% | -49.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -1.13% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.52% | -1.16% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.04% | -1.32% | -15.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.78% | -9.61% | -27.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.29% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -0.16% | -7.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 0.25% | +1.43% |
Volatility
VTV vs. NEAR - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF (NEAR) at 0.40%. This indicates that VTV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTV | NEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 0.40% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.67% | 1.01% | +6.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 1.36% | +8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.89% | 1.34% | +12.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 2.50% | +14.18% |
VTV vs. NEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTV vs. NEAR - Dividend Comparison
VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than NEAR's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEAR iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.44% | 4.54% | 5.00% | 4.59% | 1.78% | 0.76% | 1.53% | 2.69% | 2.25% | 1.52% | 1.07% | 0.85% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTV and NEAR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTV has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to NEAR (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTV dropped -59.27% vs NEAR's -9.61%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 2.82% for NEAR. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, NEAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 2.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NEAR.
NEAR has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.
VTV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while NEAR is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VTV and 0.25% for NEAR.
NEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTV and NEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer