PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTTSX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTTSX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTTSX achieves a 12.17% return, which is significantly higher than FRGAX's 9.37% return.


VTTSX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.18%
YTD
12.17%
6M
13.10%
1Y
28.27%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.95%

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTTSX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VTTSX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund
12.17%21.43%14.61%20.19%-1.87%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.37%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VTTSX and FRGAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.98

The correlation between VTTSX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTTSX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTTSX
VTTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VTTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTTSX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTTSXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.48

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.27

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.23

14.61

-0.38

VTTSX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTTSX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTTSXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.54

-0.75

Drawdowns

VTTSX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTTSX drawdown since its inception was -31.38%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTTSX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTTSXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.38%

-11.77%

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-7.03%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.51%

-11.77%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-1.58%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.57%

+0.44%

Volatility

VTTSX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VTTSX) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) at 2.75%. This indicates that VTTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTTSXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

2.75%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

7.19%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.42%

9.03%

+2.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.18%

10.31%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

10.31%

+4.79%

VTTSX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTTSX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTTSX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

VTTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, which matches FRGAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.83%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTTSX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 Fund
1.83%2.06%2.20%2.14%2.09%5.67%1.83%2.11%2.33%1.77%1.98%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VTTSX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTTSX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to FRGAX (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTTSX dropped -31.38% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTTSX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer