PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTR vs. KRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VTR vs. KRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTR achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than KRC's 3.37% return. Over the past 10 years, VTR has outperformed KRC with an annualized return of 5.81%, while KRC has yielded a comparatively lower -0.64% annualized return.


VTR

1D
-2.93%
1M
-8.76%
YTD
3.55%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
5.81%

KRC

1D
2.32%
1M
8.57%
YTD
3.37%
6M
-3.11%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
-7.32%
10Y*
-0.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTR vs. KRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
3.55%35.09%22.24%15.06%-8.53%7.73%-9.80%3.42%3.45%0.71%
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
3.37%-2.00%7.81%10.09%-39.25%19.30%-29.18%36.76%-13.54%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VTR and KRC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 1998

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between VTR and KRC has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

VTR:

$0.55

KRC:

$2.32

PE Ratio

VTR:

144.46

KRC:

16.30

PS Ratio

VTR:

6.13

KRC:

4.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

VTR:

$6.13B

KRC:

$1.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VTR:

-$261.17M

KRC:

$745.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

VTR:

$2.45B

KRC:

$808.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTR vs. KRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTR
VTR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTR Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

KRC
KRC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
KRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
KRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRC Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTR vs. KRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTRKRCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.12

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

0.44

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.00

0.93

+8.07

VTR vs. KRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the KRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTR and KRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTRKRCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.56

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.22

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

-0.02

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.19

+0.11

Drawdowns

VTR vs. KRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTR drawdown since its inception was -83.38%, roughly equal to the maximum KRC drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTR and KRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTRKRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.38%

-81.27%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.52%

-35.32%

+22.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-35.32%

+15.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.80%

-64.91%

+23.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.92%

-66.55%

-10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.88%

-41.35%

+29.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-23.42%

+5.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

16.63%

-13.45%

Volatility

VTR vs. KRC - Volatility Comparison

Ventas, Inc. (VTR) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) have volatilities of 7.93% and 7.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTRKRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

7.84%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

22.38%

-7.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

27.83%

-8.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.96%

33.96%

-9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.77%

31.59%

+3.18%

Dividends

VTR vs. KRC - Dividend Comparison

VTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than KRC's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRC
Kilroy Realty Corporation
5.70%5.78%5.34%5.42%5.48%3.07%3.43%2.28%2.85%2.21%4.61%2.21%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.46%2.48%3.06%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.37%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%20.47%

Financials

VTR vs. KRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ventas, Inc. and Kilroy Realty Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.66B
272.22M
(VTR) Total Revenue
(KRC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VTR vs. KRC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ventas, Inc. and Kilroy Realty Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
39.6%
66.8%
Portfolio components
VTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 655.41M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

KRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a gross profit of 181.91M and revenue of 272.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.

VTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 191.56M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

KRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported an operating income of 67.76M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.

VTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 55.91M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

KRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a net income of 12.42M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VTR and KRC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTR has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to KRC (7.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTR dropped -83.38% vs KRC's -81.27%.

VTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTR and KRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer